EC analysis

PW P. Winiger
TB T. E. Barrett
RS R. J. Sheesley
LH L. Huang
SS S. Sharma
LB L. A. Barrie
KY K. E. Yttri
NE N. Evangeliou
SE S. Eckhardt
AS A. Stohl
ZK Z. Klimont
CH C. Heyes
IS I. P. Semiletov
OD O. V. Dudarev
AC A. Charkin
NS N. Shakhova
HH H. Holmstrand
AA A. Andersson
ÖG Ö. Gustafsson
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The EC and organic carbon (OC) concentrations were determined by a thermal-optical transmission (TOT) analyzer (instrument #227, Sunset Laboratory, Tigard, OR) using the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 5040 protocol (34). This method is known to potentially overcorrect charring fraction relative to other methods and to underestimate the EC content (3539). During charring, parts of the OC could also end up in the EC fraction in the form of pyrogenic carbon, which would then influence the isotopic composition of the EC fraction. This effect was evaluated by a sensitivity analysis in a previous study, which concluded that the radiocarbon-derived fraction of biomass burning could be overestimated by a maximum of 7%, in extreme cases (25). The detection limit for EC was based on the OC concentration of the field blanks, which had ~100 ng C cm−2 OC (this roughly translates to 2 ng C m−3 for Zeppelin samples, which had the lowest EC concentrations measured). EC could not be detected in any of the blanks.

Annual mean concentrations were calculated asEC¯=i=1nEC(i)V(i)i=1nV(i)(1)where EC is the EC concentration unit (ng C m−3), V is the volume collected for the respective aerosol filter sample, and i is the sample index.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A