Whole Cell Electrophysiology

BT Baouyen Tran
ZJ Zhi-Gang Ji
MX Mingxuan Xu
TT Tammy N. Tsuchida
EC Edward C. Cooper
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Transfected CHO cells were recorded at room temperature (20–22°C), 1–3 days post-transfection, using an Axopatch 200B (Molecular Devices) amplifier, pCLAMP v.9, a cFlow perfusion controller and mPre8 manifold (Cell MicroControls), and glass micropipettes (VWR International) with 1–4 MΩ resistance. The extracellular solution consisted of (in mM): 138 NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 glucose, 10 HEPES, pH 7.4 with NaOH (Miceli et al., 2013). Pipette solution contained (in mM): 140 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 10 EGTA, 10 HEPES, and 5 Mg-ATP, pH 7.4 with KOH. Series resistance was compensated by 70% after compensation using Axopatch 200B fast and slow capacitance controls. Currents were digitally sampled at 5–10 kHz, depending on the protocol, and filtered at 5 kHz using a low-pass Bessel filter. For voltage-activation experiments, cells were held at −80 mV and depolarized in 10 mV incremental steps from −80 to +40 mV for 1 s, then stepped to 0 mV for 60 ms. Tail currents at 0 mV were fitted using the Boltzmann function: GGmax=11+eV12Vmk to obtain the half-maximum activation voltage (V1/2) and the slope factor (k). Activation and deactivation rates were measured in SigmaPlot or Clampfit using a single exponential function: I = Ae−t/τ + C. TEA sensitivity experiments were performed as previously described (Soldovieri et al., 2016). Currents were elicited by 3 s ramp depolarizations from −80 to 40 mV. To monitor inhibition by Oxo-M, cells were pulsed every 2 s for 200 ms to +40 mV from a holding potential of −80 mV before, during and after perfusion with drug solution. In experiments using ciVSP to study recovery, cells were held at −80 mV, then pre-pulsed for 2 s at −20 mV before stepping to +100 mV for 10 s, and then held at −20 mV for 30 s to monitor recovery. Kinetic parameters for current depletion and recovery were determined by non-linear regression models in SigmaPlot. Rates of current decline after ciVSP activation were estimated by fitting to a sigmoidal equation: y=11+ett0/b. For WT Kv7.2 + Kv7.3 heteromers, current recovery kinetics after the end of a ciVSP-activating step were fit using the squared exponential function: y2=12etτ+e2t/τ as described previously (Falkenburger et al., 2010; Alberdi et al., 2015). Current recovery for channels containing variants were fit poorly using this squared exponential but could be better fit using another sigmoidal equation, the 4-parameter logistic: y=ymax+(y0ymax(1+tymaxymin2b). A calculated liquid junction potential (−3.62 mV) was not corrected.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A