Molecular dynamics simulations were performed with the GROMACS 5 package [42,43,44,45,46] using the Amber99SB-ILDN force field for proteins that has been shown to yield an accurate description of many structural and dynamical properties of proteins [47,48,49,50]. Side chain protonation states of titratable amino acids were assigned using a value of pH = 7.4 with the help of the pdb2pqr software [51]. Capping acetyl and methyl-amino groups were added to the N and C termini of both AC5 domains and Gαi to avoid strong artifacts between non-natural termini [23,36]. The four states we study (Gαi_sym + AC5, Gαi_sym + AC5 + ATP, Gαi_tilted + AC5, Gαi_tilted + AC5 + ATP) were each placed in a truncated octahedral box and solvated with TIP3P water molecules [52] to a depth of at least 11 Å. The solute was neutralized with potassium cations, and then K+ Cl− ion pairs [53] were added to reach a physiological salt concentration of 0.15 M. Parameters for ATP and GTP were taken from [54]. The parameters for Mg2+ came from [55]. This new set of parameters was developed to improve the kinetic properties of Mg2+ ions with water and with the phosphate ion, and it was implemented in Amber99. This new set of parameters also provided a better description of the structure of Mg2+-phosphate binding than previous sets (these interactions are naturally important in our simulations in the presence of ATP) [55]. Hence, the combination of Amber 99SB-ILDN and the new set of parameters of Mg2+ ions is currently the best choice to reproduce the dynamics of AC5 and Gsα, and to properly describe the interactions of Mg2+ with AC5 and ATP.
Long-range electrostatic interactions were treated using the particle mesh Ewald method [56,57] with a real-space cutoff of 10 Å. We used virtual interaction sites for the hydrogens, and bond lengths were restrained using P-LINCS [45,58], allowing a time step of 4 fs [59]. The translational movement of the solute was removed every 1000 steps to avoid any kinetic energy build-up [60]. After energy minimization of the solvent and equilibration of the solvated system for 10 ns using a Berendsen thermostat (τT = 1 ps) and Berendsen pressure coupling (τP = 4 ps) [61], the simulations were carried out in an NTP ensemble at a temperature of 310 K and a pressure of 1 bar using a Bussi velocity-rescaling thermostat [62] (τT = 1 ps) and a Parrinello–Rahman barostat (τP = 1 ps) [63]. Simulations were carried out using typically between 72 and 120 computer cores depending on the system size, which allowed a production rate of about 100 ns/day. Analysis was carried out on a 1.1 μs production segment for each simulation, following a 400 ns equilibration period as in our previous study [25].
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.