Cell based blocking assay

XZ Xiuman Zhou
JD Jiangfeng Du
HW Hongfei Wang
CC Chunxia Chen
LJ Ling Jiao
XC Xiangrui Cheng
XZ Xiaowen Zhou
SC Shaomeng Chen
SG Shanshan Gou
WZ Wenshan Zhao
WZ Wenjie Zhai
JC Junhui Chen
YG Yanfeng Gao
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

CHOK1-TIGIT cells stably expressing human or mouse TIGIT were established by lenti-viral infection followed by puromycin selection according to the previous report [6]. Cell based blocking assay was performed according to the previous report [30]. Briefly, PVR-Fc protein was incubated with a series dilution of small molecule compounds or control buffer on ice for 30 min, human PVR-Fc (CD5-H82F6, ACRO Biosystem) and mouse PVR-Fc (50259-M03H, Sino Biological) were used at concentrations of 10 and 40 ng/test, respectively. Then the mixture of PVR protein and compounds were incubated with CHOK1-TIGIT cells for another 30 min, followed by incubation with detection antibody anti-human IgG-PE (eBioscience) for 30 min. Cells were then washed with FACS buffer to remove the unbound fluorescent antibodies, acquired on a FACS Caliber™ (BD Biosciences) and analyzed by FlowJo. To test the specificity of candidate compounds, similar blocking assays were performed by using PD-1 (PD-L1-Fc, 10,084-H02H, Sino Biological) and CD47 (Sirpα-Fc, SIA-H52A8, ACRO Biosystem) over-expressed CHOK1 cells. Cells incubated with corresponding Fc tagged protein and anti-human IgG-PE served as positive control, while cells only incubated with anti-human Fc-PE served as negative control. The mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) was recorded for calculating the blocking efficiency as the formula:

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A