Progeny Testing and Genotyping

ML Min Li
WW Wen-Sheng Wang
YP Yun-Long Pang
JD Jessica R. Domingo
JA Jauhar Ali
JX Jian-Long Xu
BF Bin-Ying Fu
EV Elec B. Venus
ZL Zhi-Kang Li
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The ST F3 progeny selected from the four populations were then progeny tested in the replicated experiments under salt stress during the dry season of 2006–2007. For each F3 line, 20 plants were evaluated with its parental ILs and IR64. The salt treatment was the same as the F2 screen described above, except after the salt concentration in the tanks was increased to EC 18 dSm-1 and maintained for 5 days, and then the salt concentration was further raised to EC 24 dSm-1 and maintained until IR64 and the parental ILs were all dead. Then, the survival plants of each F3 lines were counted. Leaf tissues from 20 plants of each of the F3 lines from each cross was bulk-harvested for DNA extraction and genotyping to reconstruct the genotypes of their original F2 plants. A total of 637 well-distributed anchor SSR markers1 from the Cornell University were used to survey the polymorphic markers differentiating the parental ILs of each cross, from which 35, 29, 6, and 25 differentiating SSR markers were used to genotype the selected ST F3 progeny and the random F2 plants from each cross.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A