Recombinant DNA for full-length ClpC1 (ClpC1-FL) and ClpC1-NTD was codon-optimized, synthesized and cloned into pET-15b vector with an N-terminal His6-SUMO tag (GenScript, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA). ClpC1-FL mutants V14A, Q17A, K85A and L92S/L96P and the N-terminal mutants FER (residues 2–145), AAFER, MAFER, MVFER and MVAFER also had His6-SUMO N-terminal tags. All proteins were prepared using Ni–NTA mini spin columns (Qiagen, Germantown, Maryland, USA). The His6-SUMO tags were cleaved with SUMO protease prepared in-house and the cleaved proteins were separated from their tags and the SUMO protease using Ni–NTA columns. The purified proteins were then buffer-exchanged into phosphate-buffered saline with 15% glycerol using a desalting column before storage at −80°C.
SPR studies were carried out using either a Biacore T200 or a Biacore 8K as reported previously (Wolf et al., 2019 ▸). In brief, ClpC1 proteins were immobilized on a CM5 sensor chip using standard amine coupling. RUF-I, ECU, OMS-A and OMS-B were isolated as described previously (Gao et al., 2014 ▸; Choules et al., 2019 ▸; Hur et al., 2018 ▸). ECU, RUF-I and OMS-A solutions were prepared at a series of increasing concentrations and were injected onto both blank surfaces and ClpC1 protein immobilized surfaces at a flow rate of 30 µl min−1 at 25°C. All sensorgrams were double-referenced with blank channels and zero concentration, followed by fitting the data with two kinetic models (1:1 Langmuir and heterogeneous ligand models) using either Biacore T200 Evaluation Software version 3 or Biacore 8K Insight Evaluation Software. All experiments, excluding the N-terminal mutants, were carried out with both ClpC1-NTD and ClpC1-FL and similar results were obtained; therefore, just one set of data is provided for simplicity.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.