Tissues were fixed with paraformaldehyde, embedded with paraffin, then cut into sections of 5 µm thickness for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis mainly according to literature studies (20). The first antibody against IQGAP1 (ab133490, Abcam), CDC (ab187643, Abcam) was respectively used at a dilution of 1:100, 1:400. The second antibody was a biotinylated IgG for 40 min incubate at 37°C. Tissue slices were visualized by the 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine solution, and cellular nuclei were slightly counterstained with hematoxylin. Substitution of the primary antibody with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was taken as a control for IHC. According to general evaluation standards (21), the staining intensity was scored as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate) or 3 (strong). The extent of staining was monitored based on the percentage of positive tumor cells: 0 (negative), 1 (1–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (51–75%) and 4 (76–100%). The final score of 0 was defined as a negative expression (−); scores of 1–3 were accepted as a low/weak expression (+), and scores over 3 were defined as a high/strong expression (++). The intensity and percentage of positive cells were evaluated at least in five separate fields at a 400-fold magnification. The IHC scores of one tissue sample was respectively determined by two pathologists, and the final score for a tissue sample was calculated from the average value of the two sets of total scores. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.