Cell shapes

JK Jae Hun Kim
AP Adrian F. Pegoraro
AD Amit Das
SK Stephan Koehler
SU Sylvia Ann Ujwary
BL Bo Lan
JM Jennifer A. Mitchel
LA Lior Atia
SH Shijie He
KW Karin Wang
DB Dapeng Bi
MZ Muhammad Zaman
JP Jin-Ah Park
JB James P. Butler
KL Kyu Ha Lee
JS Jacqueline R. Starr
JF Jeffrey J. Fredberg
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

To measure individual cell shapes, nuclei and beta-catenin were imaged with a Leica DMI8 confocal fluorescence microscope using either a 40x or 63x oil objective (Leica). Cell-cell boundaries labelled by beta-catenin were traced using the semi-automatic, watershed-based SeedWater Segmenter (SWS), as previously described [55]. Briefly, SWS takes an edge-labeled image of a confluent cellular tissue and performs a watershed segmentation based on user-given seeds. Here as input seeds we use the nuclei markers from the DAPI channel. To characterize cell shape and shape variation from cell-to-cell we used the mean of aspect ratio, AR, which was obtained from the moment of inertia tensor, and the standard deviation of the aspect ratio SD(AR), as described previously [1,2]. For example, the more elongated cell shape profile, the higher its AR. In a previous study, we had also used as an index of shape the metric q, which is the cell perimeter divided by the square root of area [2]. Although AR and q were roughly correlated in the data set described here, the observed range of AR spanned roughly four-fold whereas that of q spanned less than two-fold (Supplementary Figure S2). To better resolve small changes in cell shape, here we used AR.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A