Subjective Assessment of BPE

AS Ashirbani Saha
LG Lars J. Grimm
SG Sujata V. Ghate
CK Connie E. Kim
MS Mary S. Soo
SY Sora C. Yoon
MM Maciej A. Mazurowski
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Five breast radiologists (with 2, 10, 11, 17, and 24 years of post-fellowship experience) were included as readers in this study. The readers were blinded to the patient outcomes, the high-risk indication, the scanner selections and the contrast agents used. The studies were independently reviewed by each reader and the BPE (minimal, mild, moderate and marked) according to the 5th edition BI-RADS Atlas (16) was recorded. To record the BPE, the readers followed the description in BI-RADS that states that BPE “refers to both the volume of enhancement as well as the intensity of the enhancement and that an evaluation of BPE should take both into consideration”. The BPE states of minimal, mild, moderate and marked were converted to ordinal variables by assigning 1, 2, 3 and 4. The primary measures evaluated in this study were mean and median BPE assessment across the five readers for each study. The inter-reader agreement was calculated using Fleiss Kappa.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A