4.10. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Staining Assay

AM Arnatchai Maiuthed
CN Chuanpit Ninsontia
KE Katharina Erlenbach-Wuensch
BN Benardina Ndreshkjana
JM Julienne K. Muenzner
AC Aylin Caliskan
AH Ahmed P. Husayn
CC Chatchai Chaotham
AH Arndt Hartmann
AR Adriana Vial Roehe
VM Vijayalakshmi Mahadevan
PC Pithi Chanvorachote
RS Regine Schneider-Stock
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Serial sections (2 μm) were cut from the paraffin blocks and mounted on pre-coated slides for immunohistochemical analysis of the CAM tumors. All FFPE CAM tissue sections were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated with graded ethanol. The antigen retrieval was performed by 1 min steam cooking in TRS-Buffer pH 6 (p21 Waf1/Cip1) or pH 9 (pChk2T68), respectively. Slides were incubated at 4 °C overnight with a primary monoclonal antibody p21 Waf1/Cip1 (12D1, mouse), 1:1.000 dilution (Cell Signaling), or pChk2T68 (2197, rabbit), 1:50 dilution (Cell Signaling). Antibody binding was visualized using the Polymer-Kit (AP, Zytomed, Berlin, Germany) or biotinylated Anti-Rabbit/ABC-Kit (Vector, Olean, NY, USA).

Adjacent slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histomorphological analyses. Immunohistochemical scoring was performed in a semi-quantitative way by two pathologists (KEW, AVR). The intensity was quantified in a range from 1 to 3. The area was quantified by percentage of positive cells in 5% steps. An immunoscore was generated by multiplying intensity (0–3) with the respective percentage of positive cells (0–100%).

Bright field images (Magnification: 200×, 400×) of stained sections were taken with the Olympus XC50 camera (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in combination with the Olympus BX51 microscope (Olympus Corporation).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A