2.2. Sequence acquisition and analysis

JH J. I. Hoffman
EB E. Bauer
AP A. J. Paijmans
EH E. Humble
LB L. M. Beckmann
CK C. Kubetschek
FC F. Christaller
NK N. Kröcker
BF B. Fuchs
AM A. Moreras
YS Y. D. Shihlomule
MB M. N. Bester
AC A. C. Cleary
PB P. J. N. De Bruyn
JF J. Forcada
MG M. E. Goebel
SG S. D. Goldsworthy
CG C. Guinet
AH A. R. Hoelzel
CL C. Lydersen
KK K. M. Kovacs
AL A. Lowther
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Total genomic DNA was extracted using an adapted phenol-chloroform protocol [37]. We then sequenced a 537 base pair (bp) region of the MC1R coding region using the primers 5'-ctggagatgggtgcttcttc-3′ and 5'-tctttgtagccatgctggtg-3′ as described in detail by Peters et al. [34]. Briefly, purified PCR products were sequenced in both directions using the Applied Biosystems BigDye Terminator v. 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific: Waltham, MA, USA) and analysed on an ABI 3730xl capillary sequencer. The laboratory work was performed at Bielefeld University. Consensus sequences were then generated using ChromasPro v. 1.3.4 and aligned manually within BioEdit v. 5.0.6. The resulting alignment was used to quantify the frequencies of the wild-type and mutant (S291F) allele in each population. Heterozygous sites were identified as those with two peaks of roughly equal intensity but around half the intensity of a homozygote.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A