2.6. Stress‐induced hyperthermia

BV Baovi N. Vo
KA Kristopher K. Abney
AA Allison Anderson
EV Ezequiel Marron Fernandez de Velasco
MB Michael A. Benneyworth
JD John Scott Daniels
RM Ryan D. Morrison
CH Corey R. Hopkins
CW Charles David Weaver
KW Kevin Wickman
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Young adult (8–12 weeks) male C57BL/6J mice were evaluated in the SIH test, as described previously (Wydeven, Marron Fernandez de Velasco, et al., 2014). Mice were single‐housed a day prior to testing, a condition that has been shown to increase basal anxiety (Adriaan Bouwknecht et al., 2007; Groenink, Vinkers, van Oorschot, & Olivier, 2009). Mice were assigned randomly to different treatment groups and were injected i.p. with 10 ml·kg−1 of a microsuspension of 0‐, 3‐, 10‐, or 30‐mg·kg−1 VU0810464 in 20% β‐hydroxypropyl cyclodextrin in sterile water, 30 min before testing (Gad, Cassidy, Aubert, Spainhour, & Robbe, 2006). Subsequently, an initial rectal temperature (T1) was determined using a RET‐3 rectal probe (Physitemp Instruments, Clifton, NJ). The probe was dipped into silicon oil, inserted ∼1.5 cm into the rectum, and held until a stable rectal temperature was observed (∼20 s). Mice were then returned to their home cage for 10 min, followed by a second rectal temperature measurement (T2). The difference between the second and first temperature measurements was determined (ΔT = T2 − T1) and evaluated across treatment groups. Experimenters were blinded to the dose treatment while performing and analysing the data. To determine if the response was Kir3 dependent, SIH tests were conducted using a cohort of male and female wild‐type and Kcnj3 −/− siblings (8–12 weeks) generated in our colony. A low initial temperature (T1 < 35°C) of the animals may affect the ΔT and thus these animals were excluded for further analysis.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A