Target-Enriched GUIDE-seq (TEG-seq)

KA Keith R. Anderson
MH Maximilian Haeussler
CW Colin Watanabe
VJ Vasantharajan Janakiraman
JL Jessica Lund
ZM Zora Modrusan
JS Jeremy Stinson
QB Qixin Bei
AB Andrew Buechler
CY Charles Yu
ST Sobha R. Thamminana
LT Lucinda Tam
MS Michael-Anne Sowick
TA Tuija Alcantar
NO Natasha O’Neil
JL Jinjie Li
LT Linda Ta
LL Lisa Lima
MR Merone Roose-Girma
XR Xin Rairdan
SD Steffen Durinck
SW Søren Warming
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

TEG-seq is comparable to GUIDE-seq2. Both methods use protected short double strand DNAs to tag break sites in the genome. These tags are then used as universal primer sites for amplification and NGS mapping of the sequences flanking the break site. The TEG-seq protocol uses amplification and sequencing primer design that makes it specifically compatible with the Ion Torrent line of NGS platforms. Comparisons with data from Illiumina-based GUIDE-seq experiments suggest that both methods yield similar results (Tang et al. manuscript submitted). TEG-seq was performed by ThermoFisher. Briefly, 150,000 Neuro-2a mouse cells (ATCC® CCL131™, derived from the A/J strain24) were transfected with Cas9 protein (1µg) and a full-length synthetic Pnpla3 sgRNA (10 pmol, Synthego) complexed as ribonucleoprotein (RNP) along with a dsTag (1.25 pmol) using the Neon electroporation system, incubated for 3 days after which genomic DNA was isolated (PureLink® Genomic DNA, ThermoFisher) and subjected to the TEG-seq/GUIDE-seq procedure. Synthetic sgRNA was used for TEG-seq as we have found it to be more efficient than in vitro transcribed sgRNA for RNP electroporation. Amplicon reads were aligned to the reference mouse genome (GRCm38/mm10). The mapped reads were further preceded through Motif-Search, a plugin software for off-target search and read count (ThermoFisher). For easier comparison, total reads from the different samples were normalized by using Reads Per Million (RPM): total reads from the sample multiplied by one million and divided by total number of mapped reads of the NGS run. The off-target candidates with RPM > 1 were subjected to Targeted Amplicon re-sequencing (Ampli-seq). Primers flanking the cleavage sites and used for Ampli-seq are listed in Supplementary Table 2. Off-targets were confirmed by detection of either the dsTag or presence of indels >3 bp in the expected position upstream of the PAM site.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A