Improve Research Reproducibility A Bio-protocol resource
Concise Method
tooltip

Quality and risk of bias assessment

JE Jesse Elliott
BM Bláthnaid McCoy
TC Tammy Clifford
BP Beth K. Potter
BS Becky Skidmore
GW George A. Wells
DC Doug Coyle
ask Ask a question
Favorite

We will evaluate the quality of the included economic evaluations by use of the 10-item Drummond checklist [19] and the CHEERS statement [20]. We will also evaluate whether the economic evaluations adequately considered context-specific issues, which may influence the ability of an evaluation to address the decision problem. For example, this may include how the evaluations accounted for changes to treatment regimens or patient weight gain during the analysis horizon. Each study will be appraised independently by two reviewers, with conflicts resolved by discussion.

Copyright and License information: The Author(s). ©2019
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A