Shotgun metagenome sequencing

SW Shu-en Wu
SH Seika Hashimoto-Hill
VW Vivienne Woo
EE Emily M. Eshleman
JW Jordan Whitt
LE Laura Engleman
RK Rebekah Karns
LD Lee A. Denson
DH David B. Haslam
TA Theresa Alenghat
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

DNA was extracted from approximately 0.1 gram of stool using the PowerFecal DNA isolation kit by MO BIO (MO Bio Laboratories) per manufacturer recommendations. DNA samples were diluted to approximately 200 ng/mL and Salinibacter ruber genomic DNA was added at a final concentration of 1.4 ng/mL as an internal standard to all samples. Sequencing libraries were generated from microbial DNA using the Nextera XT protocol (Illumina). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina NextSeq500 machine using 150-bp DNA paired end reads to a depth of approximately 4 G base pairs per sample. Data can be accessed at SRA accession PRJNA644399. Raw sequence data was de-multiplexed and converted to fasta format and subjected to downstream analysis. Paired-end sequencing reads from each sample were aligned with Kraken v241 against a database consisting of the human genome and approximately 40,054 bacterial, fungal, viral and parasitic genomes. The database was derived from the RefSeq genome database (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/refseq/), human genome (GR38Ch; ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/refseq/vertebrate_mammalian/Homo_sapiens/latest_assembly_versions/), and draft genomes from NCBI Assemblies and PATRIC. Comparison of the overall microbiome composition between groups was performed by multi-response permutation procedure (MRPP) using the Vegan package in R42. Data from the human microbiome project 227 was analyzed with respect to phytase gene abundance in which patient stool was subjected to metagenomic shotgun sequencing and analyzed using the Humann2 pipeline43. Normalized counts were aligned (https://ibdmdb.org/tunnel/public/HMP2/WGS/1818/products; Merged Tables; ecs.tsv.gz) and associated metadata was downloaded from The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Multi’omics Database. Normalized reads aligning to phytase (EC 3.1.3.26) were compared between UC and non-IBD patients (all samples or the last collected sample per subject) by unpaired t-test.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A