2.4. HIV-1 p24 antigen assay and cell viability test

YZ Yury V. Zhernov
AK Andrey I. Konstantinov
AZ Alexander Zherebker
EN Eugene Nikolaev
AO Alexey Orlov
MS Mikhail I. Savinykh
GK Galina V. Kornilaeva
EK Eduard V. Karamov
IP Irina V. Perminova
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The HIV-1 Bru strain was used in this study to infect CEM-SS cells which were derived from the human lymphoblastoid cell line CEM that expresses high levels of the CD4 antigen (Wain-Hobson et al., 1991). The cells were cultured in the suspension medium RPMI-1640 (Gibco) containing 10% FCS. The CEM-SS cells were cultured at a density of 7.0 × 104/well and infected with HIVBRU at the multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1. All solutions of the HS and shilajit samples were sterilized using 0.22 μm syringe-filters (Merck Millipore Ltd) and stored at −20 °C until use. CEM-SS cells were incubated for 24 h in the absence and presence of HS and SM samples in 96-well plates. The HS and shilajit samples were homogeneous and stable throughout the incubation period in a 96-well plate. As a control, we used the reference HIV-1 inhibitors: the reverse transcriptase inhibitor Azidothymidine (AZT) and the integrase inhibitor Raltegravir (RAL). They were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. After 3 days following three washings, CEM-SS cells were cultured in 96 well plates for 3 days to measure p24 release. The level of virus replication was detected by ELISA using a «HIV-1 p24 antigen-ELISA-BEST » test system (Vector-Best, Novosibirsk, Russia). The effects on cell viability were monitored by MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay, which measures the reduction of yellow MTT to purple formazan by mitochondrial enzymes (Mosmann, 1983).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A