2.5. Statistical analysis

KR Kevin Roedl
DJ Dominik Jarczak
LT Liina Thasler
MB Martin Bachmann
FS Frank Schulte
BB Berthold Bein
CW Christian Friedrich Weber
US Ulrich Schäfer
CV Carsten Veit
HH Hans-Peter Hauber
SK Sebastian Kopp
KS Karsten Sydow
AW Andreas de Weerth
MB Marc Bota
RS Rüdiger Schreiber
OD Oliver Detsch
JR Jan-Peer Rogmann
DF Daniel Frings
BS Barbara Sensen
CB Christoph Burdelski
OB Olaf Boenisch
AN Axel Nierhaus
GH Geraldine de Heer
SK Stefan Kluge
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Data are presented as count and relative frequency or median and interquartile range. The distribution of variables was graphically assessed using histograms. Binary variables were compared using chi-square analysis or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Metric variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Binary logistic regression analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed, and factors that were considered clinically relevant and did not fulfil the criteria for multicollinearity were included in the model. We used a hierarchical backward stepwise approach. The initial model was gradually reduced. Variables that caused a change in parameter estimates by >10% or were statistically significant at a 0.05 level remained in the model. Missing values were addressed by using the multiple imputation method. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Generally, a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The study was prepared in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology recommendations (see supplementary material).24

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A