Whole-Cell Voltage-Clamp Recordings

RI Rafael Jaimes, III
DM Damon McCullough
BS Bryan Siegel
LS Luther Swift
DM Daniel McInerney
JH James Hiebert
EP Erick A. Perez-Alday
BT Beatriz Trenor
JS Jiansong Sheng
JS Javier Saiz
LT Larisa G Tereshchenko
NP Nikki Gillum Posnack
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Recordings were performed at room temperature (22°C–25°C) using HEK293 (human embryonic kidney 293) cells stably transfected with Nav1.5 cDNA. For Nav1.5 recordings, the extracellular solution (mM) included 137 NaCl, 10 HEPES, 4 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, 10 dextrose, and the intracellular solution included 120 aspartic acid, 120 CsOH, 10 CsCl, 10 HEPES, 10 EGTA, 5 MgATP, 0.4 TrisGTP. The voltage protocol (1 s duration) was repeated at 0.1 Hz. Briefly, cells were repolarized from −95 to −120 mV for 200 ms, then depolarized from −120 to −15 mV for 40 ms, and further depolarized to +40 mV for 200 ms, followed by a voltage ramp down phase for 100 ms from +40 to −95 mV. Nav1.5 late current was induced by 20 nmol/L anemone toxin in the extracellular solution, which allowed for the study of late sodium current contribution from Nav1.5 that is separate from fast sodium current, as previously described.58 Nav1.5 fast current was measured in the absence of anemone toxin. For positive control, 30 µM tetrodotoxin (sodium channel blocker) was directly applied to recordings and resulted in 98.3±0.7% Nav1.5 current block (n=3). To ensure baseline recording was stable enough for drug application, cells were presented with this voltage protocol in control solution until Nav1.5 current amplitudes for 12 consecutively recorded current traces (2-minute duration) exhibit <10% difference. Effects were monitored for 3 minutes before and after application of MEHP (n=4 per dose). To quantify drug potency against Nav1.5 channels, the steady state Nav1.5 current amplitude (averaged value from 5 steady state current traces) in drug solution was divided by the averaged amplitude from the last 5 traces measured in control solution to calculate the fractional block. Then, fractional block was plotted against drug concentration tested, fitted with the Hill Equation to generate an half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) and the Hill coefficient.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A