Routine histology was used to produce tissue sections for histological analyses of the rat livers. For semi-quantitative assessment of histopathological alterations to the rat liver, we adopted and extended methods previously described [14].
In our proposed model, a semi-quantitative and quantitative approach was used. Pathological changes were classified into six reaction patterns: steatosis, glycogen storage, atrophy, apoptosis, necrosis, and nuclear alterations. Histopathological alterations of the liver tissue were given one of two assessment values: (1) focal appearance-minimal pathological importance (easily reversible lesions) (2) diffuse appearance-moderate pathological importance (reversible lesions if the stressor is neutralized), and in the case of steatosis, microvesicular (1) and macrovesicular (2). Secondly, in order to obtain a more detailed semi-quantitative analysis, we introduced a second score (s) for each alteration, ranging from 1–10, depending on the degree of histopathological alteration: 1–3 = control, 4–7 = moderate, 8–10 = severe. For example, a particular tissue could show severe diffuse apoptosis and, as such, be assigned as a = 2 and s = 9. Finally, these two values were multiplied to obtain score values (see equation below). The arithmetic mean of these products (mean scored value) represents the degree of damage to a liver tissue after feeding with the experimental diets, following the calculation principle. Nuclear alterations were calculated by assessing ten high-power microscopic fields (×400) in ten random and non-overlapping fields for each specimen.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.