Statistical analysis

QC Qingqing Cheng
JH Jiaxi Huang
JL Jianye Liang
MM Mengjie Ma
QZ Qian Zhao
XL Xueping Lei
CS Changzheng Shi
LL Liangping Luo
ask Ask a question
Favorite

To compare the differences in age and sex distribution between the patients with PD and normal controls, independent samples t-test and the Pearson χ2 test were used. To evaluate the inter-observer reliability of the QSM and R2* measurement by two neuro-radiologists, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. An ICC>0.81 was considered for excellent agreement; 0.61-0.80, good agreement; 0.41-0.60, moderate agreement; and <0.40, poor agreement. The normality of the data was analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The group differences in the regional susceptibility and R2* values between patients with PD and normal controls were compared using an independent samples t-test. When significant differences were found between the two groups, the diagnostic characteristics of QSM and R2* mapping were analyzed for the corresponding region using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A correlation analysis between susceptibility and R2* values and clinical features in patients with PD was performed. Pearson's correlation analysis was also utilized to investigate the correlation between the average susceptibility or R2* values in each targeted region for all the normal controls in the present study, and the mean iron concentration in the corresponding regions of normal individuals determined in a previous post-mortem study (13). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. SPSS v13.0 (SPSS, Inc.) was used for all statistical analyses.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A