Measuring NIR-II quantum yield

AA Alexander L. Antaris
HC Hao Chen
SD Shuo Diao
ZM Zhuoran Ma
ZZ Zhe Zhang
SZ Shoujun Zhu
JW Joy Wang
AL Alexander X. Lozano
QF Quli Fan
LC Leila Chew
MZ Mark Zhu
KC Kai Cheng
XH Xuechuan Hong
HD Hongjie Dai
ZC Zhen Cheng
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The fluorescence quantum yield of CH-4T and complexes were measured in a similar manner as described in previous publications1,2. Briefly, HiPCO SWCNTs were utilized as a reference fluorophore due to their high aqueous stability. The quantum yield of HiPCO SWCNTs has previously been determined as 0.4% based on an IR-26 quantum yield of 0.5% in DCE (please see Discussion for further details on IR-26 quantum yield). A serial dilution of five solutions of HiPCO SWCNTs as well as CH-4T and complexes with an OD <0.1 at 808 nm was measured to confirm absorbance values at 808 nm and the fluorescent emission spectrum was collected on a wavelength-corrected NIR-II spectrometer in a 1 cm quartz cuvette (Starna) in the manner specified above. The fluorescent emission spectrum was integrated and plotted against the OD value at 808 nm and a linear fit was applied to verify the linearity between fluorescent brightness and concentration. For the brightest samples, inter-filter effects were seen ∼OD 0.1 at 808 nm, thus lower concentration ranges were utilized. By comparing the slope of the linear fit between HiPCO SWCNTs and CH-4T and complexes, the quantum yield was determined based on the following supporting equation (1):

where QYsample is the QY of CH-4T and complexes, QYref is the QY of HiPCO SWCNTs in water (0.4% based on IR-26=0.5% in DCE1), nsample and nref are the refractive indices of HiPCO SWCNTs, CH-4T and complex solutions which are both water (1.33) in this case.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A