Improve Research Reproducibility A Bio-protocol resource
Concise Method
tooltip

Quality Assessment

BG Bart van Groningen
MS M.C. van der Steen
DJ Daan M. Janssen
LR Lodewijk W. van Rhijn
AL Antoine N. van der Linden
RJ Rob P.A. Janssen
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Two reviewers (B.v.G., M.C.v.d.S.) independently assessed the individual studies for risk of bias. The assessment was based on the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias.29 Risk of bias and assessed types of bias are presented in Table 1. Items could be scored as low risk (+), high risk (–), unknown/not reported (?), or not applicable (NA). The assessments by the 2 independent reviewers were compared and discussed for final consensus. Another reviewer could be consulted in case of nonconsent.

Risk of Bas in Included Studies

NA, not applicable; SNQ, signal to noise quotient; +, low risk of bias; -, high risk of bias; ?, unknown/not reported.

Copyright and License information:  ©2020 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A