2.3. Physicochemical analysis

JC Jesús A. Cantú‐Valdéz
GG Guadalupe Gutiérrez‐Soto
CH Carlos A. Hernández‐Martínez
SS Sugey R. Sinagawa‐García
AQ Armando Quintero‐Ramos
MH Michael E. Hume
DH Daniela D. Herrera‐Balandrano
GM Gerardo Méndez‐Zamora
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Meat pH was measured with a puncture electrode (HI 99163, Hanna Instruments WoonSocket, RI, USA) at 4°C. Meat color values for variables of lightness (L*), redness (a*), yellowness (b*), Chroma (saturation index), and Hue angle were measured on the surfaces of the lean meat samples in areas without fat and connective tissue using a colorimeter (CR‐400 Konica Minolta®, Tokyo, Japan; Illuminant/Observer: D65/10) calibrated with a standard white plate and specified by CIE Lab System (CIE, 1976). Total color change (ΔE) and browning index (BI) were calculated according to equations used by Bozkurt and Bayram (2006), and the colorimeter calibration values L0 = 94.18, a0 = −0.43, and b0 = 3.98 to estimate ΔE and BI. Water‐holding capacity (WHC) was determined using the compression method according to Tsai and Ockerman (1981) and Méndez‐Zamora et al. (2015) with slight modifications. A total of 0.3 g of meat was placed between two filter papers and placed between two 12 × 12 cm plexiglass plates, and a force of 4.0 kg was applied for 20 min; the initial (IW) and final weights (FW) were recorded, and WHC was estimated as WHC = 100‐[((IW‐FW)/IW × 100]. The physicochemical variables were determinate in six different subgroups per treatment/replicate (n = 12).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A