A total of 2 × 106 PAMs (n = 3 pigs) were seeded per well/12-well plate and were maintained for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. All treatments were carried out in duplicate. For MCC950 treatment: PAMs were treated with MCC950 (dissolved in DMSO; EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) at a final concentration of 10 μM for one hour at 37 °C prior to infection/transfection. Mock-treated groups were treated with an equal volume (50 µL/100 mL media) of DMSO. Following MCC950 treatment, PAMs were either infected with VR-2332 (M.O.I. 1), Ingelvac MLV (M.O.I. 1), transfected with 1 μg of poly I:C (polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid) (EMD Millipore) using Fugene6 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol or mock infected/transfected. Poly I:C served as a positive control, as it is a well-known activator of the NLRP3 inflammasome [16]. At 3, 6, and 9 h post-infection (hpi)/transfection (hpt), PAMs were collected in Tri-Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and total RNA was purified and subjected to on-column DNase treatment using a RNA Clean and Concentrator kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA quality was assessed using agarose electrophoresis. One microgram of DNase-treated total RNA per sample was reverse transcribed using a SuperScript III kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers used for RT-qPCR are provided in Table S1. Primers were designed using primer-BLAST (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/), and when possible, such that one of the primers spanned an exon–exon junction. Each RT-qPCR reaction contained 10 ng cDNA, 1X iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and 500 nM of each forward and reverse primer. RT-qPCR conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, then 58 °C for 20 s. All reactions were performed in duplicate. Melting curve analysis was utilized to confirm gene-specific amplification. Threshold cycle (Ct) values were normalized to the expression levels of Ribosomal protein L4 (RPL4). Relative expressions were determined using the 2−∆∆Ct method [17]. Secreted IL1B levels in cell culture supernatants were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (ELISA) for porcine IL1B (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in expression were determined using analysis of variance SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
In a second experiment 5 × 106 PAMs (n = 3 pigs) were seeded per well/6-well plate and were maintained for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. PAMs were either treated with MCC950, at a final concentration of 10 µM, or mock-treated for 1 h at 37 °C. PAMs were then transfected with 1 μg of poly I:C (EMD Millipore) using Fugene6 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol or mock transfected, resulting in four treatment groups: MCC950 and poly I:C treated, MCC950 only, poly I:C only, and mock-treated/transfected (negative control). At 24 hpt cell culture supernatants were collected. Pig-matched PAMs (2 × 106 cells per/well/12-well plate) were then treated with 400 µL of cell culture supernatants from one of the four groups for 1 h at 37 °C and then infected with either VR-2332 (M.O.I. 1) or Ingelvac MLV (M.O.I. 1). At 6, 12, 24, and 48 h post-infection, PAMs were collected in Tri-Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and total RNA was purified and subjected to on-column DNase treatment using a RNA Clean and Concentrator kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. One microgram of DNase-treated total RNA per sample was reverse transcribed using a SuperScript III kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. PRRSV RNA levels were quantified using RT-qPCR as described above. Secreted IL1B levels in cell culture supernatants were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (ELISA) for porcine IL1B (MyBioSource), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in expression were determined using analysis of variance (SAS).
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.