The data set from the clinical dOFM BE study [2] included data on the dermal PK of acyclovir delivered topically from the R and T products parameterized as PK endpoint data (area under the dermal concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak/maximum dermal concentration (Cmax) values), as well as demographic data, data on each subject’s skin barrier properties (TEWL, skin conductance), skin temperature, dOFM probe-related data (probe depths), and data derived from methodological monitoring (glucose-loss, recovered lactate and sample mass) (Table (Table11).
Data set of the acyclovir dOFM BE study
137 h of sampling: One hour baseline sampling followed by 36 h of post-dose sampling in 4 h- intervals (10 samples per probe).
The results of the BE evaluation of this study have been published by Bodenlenz et al. [2]. The relative bioavailability of R vs. R and T vs. R has been evaluated based on the conventional BE PK endpoints, AUC and Cmax in the dermis, where the criterion for establishing the BE of a T to an R is that the 90% confidence interval of the geometric mean ratio between the T and R falls within 0.80 and 1.25. In brief, the positive control products (R vs. R) were accurately and reproducibly confirmed to be bioequivalent [AUC0–36 h (0.86–1.18) and Cmax (0.86–1.21)], while the negative control products (T vs. R) were sensitively discriminated not to be bioequivalent for both parameters [AUC0–36 h (0.69–1.05) and Cmax (0.61–1.02)].
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.