The Follow-up Study at the Single Variant Level

CL Chunyu Liu
AK Aldi T. Kraja
JS Jennifer A. Smith
JB Jennifer A. Brody
NF Nora Franceschini
JB Joshua C. Bis
KR Kenneth Rice
AM Alanna C. Morrison
YL Yingchang Lu
SW Stefan Weiss
XG Xiuqing Guo
WP Walter Palmas
LM Lisa W. Martin
YC Yii-Der Ida Chen
PS Praveen Surendran
FD Fotios Drenos
JC James P. Cook
PA Paul L. Auer
AC Audrey Y. Chu
AG Ayush Giri
WZ Wei Zhao
JJ Johanna Jakobsdottir
LL Li-An Lin
JS Jeanette M. Stafford
NA Najaf Amin
HM Hao Mei
JY Jie Yao
AV Arend Voorman
ML Martin G. Larson
MG Megan L. Grove
AS Albert V. Smith
SH Shih-Jen Hwang
HC Han Chen
TH Tianxiao Huan
GK Gulum Kosova
NS Nathan O. Stitziel
SK Sekar Kathiresan
NS Nilesh Samani
HS Heribert Schunkert
PD Panos Deloukas
ML Man Li
CF Christian Fuchsberger
CP Cristian Pattaro
MG Mathias Gorski
CK Charles Kooperberg
GP George J. Papanicolaou
JR Jacques E. Rossouw
JF Jessica D. Faul
SK Sharon L.R. Kardia
CB Claude Bouchard
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The follow-up study was performed in external samples (follow-up samples) including a total of 180,726 individuals from the CHD Exome+ Consortium, ExomeBP Consortium, GoT2DGenes Consortium, T2D–GENES consortium (Supplementary Note). Summary information about participants, genotyping and quality control in the follow-up samples are presented in Supplementary Note. The follow-up samples provided SNP association statistics for DBP, PP, SBP, and HTN but not MAP for a total of 180,726 individuals. Significant variants (P ≤ 3.4 × 10−7) in the discovery samples were considered replicated in the follow-up samples with P ≤ 0.05/n with their pre-specified BP trait in the follow-up sample alone, where n was the number of variants tested in the follow-up samples. Both the significant variants from discovery and additional variants with P ≤ 1 × 10−5 from the discovery samples were selected for joint meta-analysis with the follow-up samples. The primary meta-analysis of the discovery and follow-up results was performed in individuals of all ancestries. The secondary meta-analysis was conducted in the EA only samples. The inverse variance weighted method was used in meta-analysis of the discovery and follow-up stage results for DBP, PP and SBP. Because the follow-up samples provided only z-scores and sample sizes for HTN, the optimally weighted z-score method81 was used in meta-analysis of HTN. The threshold of P ≤ 3.4 ×10−7 was required for significance in meta-analyses of the discovery and follow-up samples.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A