The follow-up study was performed in external samples (follow-up samples) including a total of 180,726 individuals from the CHD Exome+ Consortium, ExomeBP Consortium, GoT2DGenes Consortium, T2D–GENES consortium (Supplementary Note). Summary information about participants, genotyping and quality control in the follow-up samples are presented in Supplementary Note. The follow-up samples provided SNP association statistics for DBP, PP, SBP, and HTN but not MAP for a total of 180,726 individuals. Significant variants (P ≤ 3.4 × 10−7) in the discovery samples were considered replicated in the follow-up samples with P ≤ 0.05/n with their pre-specified BP trait in the follow-up sample alone, where n was the number of variants tested in the follow-up samples. Both the significant variants from discovery and additional variants with P ≤ 1 × 10−5 from the discovery samples were selected for joint meta-analysis with the follow-up samples. The primary meta-analysis of the discovery and follow-up results was performed in individuals of all ancestries. The secondary meta-analysis was conducted in the EA only samples. The inverse variance weighted method was used in meta-analysis of the discovery and follow-up stage results for DBP, PP and SBP. Because the follow-up samples provided only z-scores and sample sizes for HTN, the optimally weighted z-score method81 was used in meta-analysis of HTN. The threshold of P ≤ 3.4 ×10−7 was required for significance in meta-analyses of the discovery and follow-up samples.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.