We identified 42,359 cancer survivors alive and aged ≥19 as of 12/31/2016. To be included, patients had to have ≥1 office visit at one of 431 primary care clinics that were actively using an EHR system throughout the three-year study period (2014–2016), and had to have a record in a discrete searchable EHR field (i.e., encounter diagnosis, problem list, medical history) indicating a malignant cancer diagnosis, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer. These cancer survivors represented 3.0% of our CHC patient population within the 19 states with active primary care clinics in the ADVANCE network.
To construct a comparison group, we identified >1.2 million adult patients from the same clinics with no documented cancer diagnosis as of 12/31/2016. This population was younger and had a different sex distribution than cancer survivors; thus, to reduce bias and improve group comparisons, cancer survivors were matched in a 1:3 ratio26 to this comparison group. We matched on sex, year of birth, and primary health system (each patient’s most frequently accessed CHC): for each cancer survivor, 3 matches were selected at random and without replacement. This exact matching method resulted in exclusion of 2,093 cancer survivors because they had <3 control matches available (4.9% of survivors). Excluded patients were more commonly male, non-Hispanic white, and older than included cancer patients. The final dataset contained 40,226 cancer survivors with 47,339 primary cancer sites (as a single patient can have >1 cancer site) and 120,798 matched comparison patients.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.