Protein identification and quantitation

MM Marta Martin-Lorenzo
LG Laura Gonzalez-Calero
PM Paula J. Martinez
MB Montserrat Baldan-Martin
JL Juan Antonio Lopez
GR Gema Ruiz-Hurtado
FC Fernando de la Cuesta
JS Julián Segura
JV Jesús Vazquez
FV Fernando Vivanco
MB Maria G. Barderas
LR Luis M. Ruilope
GA Gloria Alvarez-Llamas
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Labelled peptides were analyzed by LC-MS/MS using a C-18 reversed phase nano-column (75 µm I.D. × 50 cm, 2 µm particle size, Acclaim PepMap RSLC, 100 C18; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a continuous acetonitrile gradient consisting of 0–30% B in 360 min, 50–90% B in 3 min (A = 0.1% formic acid; B = 90% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid). A flow rate of 200 nL/min was used to elute peptides from the nano-column to an emitter nanospray needle for real time ionization and peptide fragmentation on a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher). An enhanced FT-resolution spectrum (resolution = 70,000) followed by the MS/MS spectra from the 15 most intense parent ions were analyzed along the chromatographic run. Dynamic exclusion was set at 40 s. For peptide identification, all spectra were analyzed with Proteome Discoverer (version 1.4.0.29, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using SEQUEST-HT (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For database searching at the Uniprot database containing all sequences from human and crap contaminants (March 06, 2013; 70024 entries), the parameters were selected as follows: trypsin digestion with 2 maximum missed cleavage sites, precursor and fragment mass tolerances of 2 Da and 0.02 Da, respectively, carbamidomethyl cysteine, iTRAQ modifications at N-terminal and Lys residues as fixed modifications, and methionine oxidation as dynamic modification. Peptide identification was validated using the probability ratio method48. False discovery rate (FDR) was calculated using inverted databases, and the refined method49 with an additional filtering for precursor mass tolerance of 12 ppm50. Only peptides with a confidence of at least 95% were used to quantify the relative abundance of each peptide determined as previously described. Protein quantification from reporter ion intensities and statistical analysis of quantitative data to identify significant proteins were performed using QuiXoT based on a statistical model previously described51. In this model protein log2-ratios are expressed in form of the standardized variables, i.e., in units of standard deviation according to their estimated variances (Zq values). Individual protein responses to albuminuria development were evaluated. An average of Zq value of the four biological replicates was calculated per condition. Ratio of change between two conditions was expressed as the difference in average Zq values between compared groups (dnA/N and MHA/N).Those proteins with ratio of change between groups ≥|2|, and a minimum of 3 peptides identified were selected for further analysis.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A