Corneal Kindling

JW Jeffrey M. Witkin
GL Guanguan Li
LG Lalit K. Golani
WX Wenhui Xiong
JS Jodi L. Smith
XP Xingjie Ping
FR Farjana Rashid
RJ Rajwana Jahan
RC Rok Cerne
JC James M. Cook
XJ Xiaoming Jin
ask Ask a question
Favorite

In the corneal kindling experiments, KRM-II-81 was evaluated for its ability to block seizures in fully kindled mice. Adult male CF1 mice (n = 8 per group, 18–25 g) were kindled using methods previously described (Matagne and Klitgaard, 1998; Rowley and White, 2010). They were kindled to a criterion of five consecutive secondarily generalized seizures of stage 5 (Racine, 1972). Briefly, mice were exposed to twice daily corneal stimulation (3 mA at 60 Hz for 3 seconds). After reaching the first stage 5 seizure (generally after about 2 weeks), the twice daily stimulation regimen was continued until each mouse achieved the criteria of five consecutive stage 5 seizures, at which point the mouse was considered to be fully seizure kindled. Fully kindled mice continued to be stimulated every 2 to 3 days until all mice became fully kindled.

Testing of KRM-II-81 began at least 5 days after the last corneal stimulation. KRM-II-81 was dosed orally 2 hours prior to stimulation for the assessment of anticonvulsant efficacy. Doses of 1–30 mg/kg were tested in groups of eight mice. Doses were selected based on the efficacy of KRM-II-81 studied in other seizure models by this route, where 10 mg/kg was a minimal effective dose (Witkin et al., 2018). Oral dosing was used here to define oral efficacy based on the oral dosing exposure of KRM-II-81 (Poe et al., 2016; Witkin et al., 2019ba). The percentage of mice protected and the seizure severity score (Racine, 1972) were measured.

The effects of KRM-II-81 on seizure protection were assessed by Fisher’s exact probability test and the ED50 and 95% confidence limits were determined by probit analysis. Effects of KRM-II-81 on seizure severity scores were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. Probabilities of < 0.05 were set a priori as the accepted level of statistical significance.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A