Prepulse Inhibition (PPI)

KU Kerstin Ure
HL Hui Lu
WW Wei Wang
AI Aya Ito-Ishida
ZW Zhenyu Wu
LH Ling-jie He
YS Yehezkel Sztainberg
WC Wu Chen
JT Jianrong Tang
HZ Huda Y Zoghbi
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Mice were habituated for 30 min outside the test room. Each mouse was placed singly in SR-LAB PPI apparatus (San Diego Instruments, San Diego, CA), which consisted of a Plexiglass tube-shaped holder in a sound-insulated lighted box, with 70 dB white noise and allowed to habituate for 5 min. The mouse was presented with eight types of stimulus, each presented six times in pseudo-random order with a 10–20 ms intertrial period: no sound, a 40 ms 120 db startle burst, three 20 ms prepulse sounds of 74, 78, and 82 dB each presented alone, and a combination of each of the three prepulse intensities presented 100 ms before the 120 dB startle burst. After the test, mice were returned to their home cage. The acoustic startle response was recorded every 1 ms during the 65 ms period following the onset of the startle stimulus and was calculated as the average response to the 120 db startle burst normalized to body weight. Percent prepulse inhibition was calculated using the following formula: (1-(averaged startle response to prepulse before startle stimulus/averaged response to startle stimulus)) x 100. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of mean. Percent prepulse inhibition was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc analysis, and acoustic startle response was analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A