Comparison to Other Prognostic Indices Designed to Predict TTFT

SM Stefano Molica
TS Tait D. Shanafelt
DG Diana Giannarelli
MG Massimo Gentile
RM Rosanna Mirabelli
GC Giovanna Cutrona
LL Luciano Levato
NR Nicola Di Renzo
FR Francesco Di Raimondo
CM Caterina Musolino
FA Francesco Angrilli
AF Angelo Famà
AR Anna Grazia Recchia
KC Kari G. Chaffee
AN Antonino Neri
NK Neil E. Kay
MF Manlio Ferrarini
FM Fortunato Morabito
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

To explore the ability of the CLL-IPI to predict TTFT relative to other prognostic indices specifically developed to predict this endpoint, we also evaluated the 2011 MDACC score and the O-CLL1 score in this cohort (9,13). The 2011 MDACC score was calculated according to the following formula: I(No. of lymph node sites involved=3) × 7.370 + I(FISH=del11q) × 9.312 + I(FISH=del17p) × 11.285 + (diameter of largest cervical lymph node in cm) × 4.172 + (LDH/100) × I([IGHV gene=mutated] × 5.000 + (LDH÷100) × I(IGHV gene=unmutated)×1.065] + 35.467. The indicator function (I) is equal to 1 if the statement in the parentheses is true and is equal to 0 otherwise(9). The OCLL-1 was defined as the sum of the risk scores of the four individual parameters (i.e., Rai stages, β2-microglobulin, absolute lymphocyte count, mutational status of IGHV). According to the these criteria, 3 different risk categories for TFS were determined: low (score 0–2), intermediate (score 3–5), and high (score 6–7)(13).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A