Intracranial Vessel Wall Plaque and Lumen Evaluation

LN Ling Ni
FZ Fei Zhou
ZQ Zhao Qing
XZ Xin Zhang
ML Ming Li
BZ Bin Zhu
BZ Bing Zhang
YX Yun Xu
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The intracranial vessel wall images were evaluated by two independent neuroradiologists (LN, FZ, with 7 and 4 years of experience in neurovascular imaging, respectively), who were blinded to the WMH information, using a Philips MR workstation (Extended Workstation, EWS) (Qiao et al., 2014). The range of intracranial atherosclerosis we evaluated included the intracranial portion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) to the second segment of the anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral arteries. The degree of plaque enhancement was graded as follows: 0 = no enhancement; 1 = mild enhancement; and 2 = obvious enhancement (Qiao et al., 2014). The presence or absence of contrast-enhanced lesions in the aforementioned arteries was determined. If multiple arterial segments showed plaque enhancement, the segment with the most severe stenosis was considered the location of the lesion. The ICAS stenosis was graded as follows: 1 = mild (<50%); 2 = moderate (50–69%); 3/4 = severe stenosis/occlusion (70–100%), based on the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (NASCET) criteria.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A