Mitotic rate

AS Andrea Strakova
TN Thomas J. Nicholls
AB Adrian Baez-Ortega
ML Máire Ní Leathlobhair
AS Alexander T. Sampson
KH Katherine Hughes
IB Isobelle A. G. Bolton
KG Kevin Gori
JW Jinhong Wang
IA Ilona Airikkala-Otter
JA Janice L. Allen
KA Karen M. Allum
CA Clara L. Arnold
LB Leontine Bansse-Issa
TB Thinlay N. Bhutia
JB Jocelyn L. Bisson
KB Kelli Blank
CB Cristóbal Briceño
AD Artemio Castillo Domracheva
AC Anne M. Corrigan
HC Hugh R. Cran
JC Jane T. Crawford
SC Stephen M. Cutter
ED Eric Davis
KC Karina F. de Castro
AN Andrigo B. De Nardi
AV Anna P. de Vos
LK Laura Delgadillo Keenan
ED Edward M. Donelan
AH Adela R. Espinoza Huerta
IF Ibikunle A. Faramade
MF Mohammed Fazil
EF Eleni Fotopoulou
SF Skye N. Fruean
FG Fanny Gallardo-Arrieta
OG Olga Glebova
PG Pagona G. Gouletsou
RM Rodrigo F. Häfelin Manrique
JH Joaquim J. G. P. Henriques
RH Rodrigo S. Horta
NI Natalia Ignatenko
YK Yaghouba Kane
CK Cathy King
DK Debbie Koenig
AK Ada Krupa
SK Steven J. Kruzeniski
ML Marta Lanza-Perea
ML Mihran Lazyan
AQ Adriana M. Lopez Quintana
TL Thibault Losfelt
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

A blinded histopathology scoring study was performed by a single scorer, under the guidance of a veterinary pathologist. Twenty-eight A1d1a CTVT histology samples were scored, together with 31 CTVT_HT1 and CTVT_HT2 CTVT controls. CTVT_HT1 and CTVT_HT2 controls were phylogenetically matched with A1d1a tumours. The 28 A1d1a CTVTs belonged to 8 horizontal transfer groups (HT3, 2 tumours; HT8, 6 tumours; HT9, 13 tumours; HT10, 1 tumour; HT13, 1 tumour; HT14, 1 tumour; HT16, 1 tumour; HT17, 3 tumours). Histology slides were scanned using a Hamamatsu Nanozoomer 2.0-HT slide scanner (C9600) before scoring, and were viewed using the NDP.view2 software (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). Each field was defined to consist of at least half CTVT parenchyma, avoiding areas of artefactual distortion, ulceration or haemorrhage. The number of mitotic figures (including bizarre mitotic figures) per 10 high-power fields (40×, a mitotic box of area 0.0325 cm2, perimeter 722 µm on NDP.view2) was assessed. Statistical significance was tested using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test implemented in R41.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A