Duplicate data were extracted independently (RH & TM) using a standard spreadsheet, which captured information on study design, population, and the association between cognitive dysfunction and nocturia. A summary is provided in the results section (Tables 1 & 2).
Study characteristics
858 outpatients admitted to a
geriatric center
Female: 100%
Mean (sd) age: 74.1 (8.2) years
“Generally, during the past
30 days, how many times do you usually urinate after you have gone to sleep at night until the time you got up in the morning?”
Cut-off: 1, 2, 3, 4 or more
Prevalence: 19.0, 24.2, 18.4, and 24.1% respectively
MMSE and Dementia diagnosed using the DSM V
Mean (sd) MMSE score: 24.7 (4.9), 25.0 (4.2), 24.9 (3.7), 24.2 (4.4), 23.9 (4.9) in patients with 0, 1, 2, 3 or ≥ 4 nocturia episodes respectively
Prevalence (dementia): 4.4%
376 patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease
Female: 51.1%
Age range: 56–92 years
OABSS
Mean (sd) number of nocturia episodes: 1.2 (0.8), 1.2 (0.9) and 1.6 (1.0) in patients with OABSS ≤5, 6–11 or ≥ 12 respectively
Prevalence: NR
MMSE and CDR scale
Mean (sd) MMSE score: 14.4 (7.6) in patients with OAB
Mean (sd) CDR score: 2.3 (0.9) in patients with OAB
454 patients with Parkinson’s disease
Female: 42.7%
Mean (sd) age: 61.5 (10.9) years
NMSS
Mean (sd) NMSS score for nocturia: 2.4 (3.3)
Cut-off: NR
Prevalence: 47.2%
MoCA
Mean (sd) MoCA score: 23.7 (4.5)
Prevalence (MoCA ≤25): 58.1%
143 patients with Parkinson’s disease
Female: 35%
Mean (sd) age: 64.7 (9.0) years
“When you awaken during the night, how often do you urinate?” on sleep questionnaire drawn from existing studies; Nocturia frequency evaluated on 4-point Likert scale (1 = “never,” 4 = “very often”)
Prevalence: NR
Impulsivity determined by at least 1 “yes” to the Minnesota Impulse Disorder Interview (MIDI) questions
Prevalence: 26.6%
63 patients with Parkinson’s disease
Female: 35%
Mean (sd) age: 63 (9.7) years
IPSS
Cut-off: ≥2 voids/nights
Prevalence: 61%
MMSE
Mean (sd) MMSE score: 28.6 (1.5) in patients without nocturia and 28.5 (1.9) in patients without
Prevalence: NR
1288 community-dwelling individuals
Female: 57%
Mean (sd) age: 74.2 (6.3) years
History taking
Cut-off: ≥2 voids/nights
Prevalence: 45.8%
MMSE
Mean (sd) MMSE score: 25.3 (4.8)
Prevalence: NR
299 community-dwelling men
Mean (sd) age: 71.2 (5.0) years
History taking
Cut-off: ≥2 voids/nights
Prevalence: 56.0%
MMSE
Mean (sd) MMSE score: 25.6 (3.4)
Prevalence: NR
1000 Medicare beneficiaries
Female: 50%
Mean (sd) age: 73.8 (NR) years
History taking
Cut-off: ≥2 voids/nights
Prevalence: 58.5%
MMSE
Mean (sd) MMSE score: 25 (4.9)
Prevalence (MMSE < 24): 29.8%
BPH Benign prostatic hypertrophy, CI Confidence interval, CDR Clinical Dementia Rating; DSM Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, HAMA Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, HAMD Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, IPSS International Prostate Symptom Score, MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, NMSS Non-Motor Symptom Scale, NR Not reported, OABSS Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, OR Odds ratio, r Correlation coefficient, sd Standard deviation, UPDRS Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale
Association between cognitive dysfunction and nocturia
Lower MMSE scores in patients with ≥2 nocturia episodes compared to those with < 2 episodes; MCID observed only for the group with at least 4 nocturnal voids compared to the group with 1 nocturnal void
No difference in dementia prevalence
No significant correlation between nocturia and MMSE
Significant correlation between nocturia and CDR scale: r = 0.23; MCID: not assessable
Significant difference of nocturia prevalence in patients with cognitive dysfunction vs. without 56.3% vs. 36.8%.
Mean (sd) NMSS nocturia sub-score significantly higher in patients with cognitive dysfunction vs. without 2.9 (3.4) vs. 1.7 (3.0); MCID: not assessable
MMSE protective factor of nocturia with OR 0.9 (CI non available)
MCID not assessable
BPH Benign prostatic hypertrophy; CI Confidence interval, CDR Clinical dementia rating scale (MCID: 1–2 point increase indicative of a meaningful decline), HAMA Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, HAMD Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, MCID Minimal clinically important difference, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination (MCID: 1–3 point decrease indicative of a meaningful decline), NMSS Non-Motor Symptom Scale (MCID: 13.91 point increase indicative of a meaningful change), OR Odds ratio, r Correlation coefficient, sd standard deviation, UPDRS Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale
Variables included in multivariable analysis:
aAge, age of onset, gender, education level, scores of speech, facial expression, tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia and axial impairment in the UPDRS, total HAMD and HAMA scores, presence of sleep/ fatigue, perceptual problems/hallucinations, attention/memory, gastrointestinal domains from NMSS
bHistory of BPH, age, education, depression, alpha-blocker, transitional zone volume of prostate
cAge, ethnicity, obesity, urban status (vs rural)
dAge, ethnicity, hypertension, lower limb oedema, history of urinary incontinence, urban status (vs rural)
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.