Visit order

RJ Robert-Paul Juster
DD David Matthew Doyle
MH Mark L. Hatzenbuehler
BE Bethany G. Everett
LD L. Zachary DuBois
JM Jennifer J. McGrath
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The order of visits was counterbalanced randomly to manipulate experienced novelty of the testing environment (Sindi, Fiocco, Juster, Pruessner, & Lupien, 2013). In the first group (morning/afternoon; n = 49), participants received a blood draw (findings reported elsewhere; (Juster, Almeida et al., 2016; Juster, Ouelle, et al., 2016; Juster, Smith, Ouellet, Sindi, & Lupien, 2013)) in the morning during their first visit and were exposed to the TSST in the afternoon during their second visit about a week later; this was reversed for the second group (afternoon/morning; n = 37). Since the second group arrived for the first time to our laboratory when exposed to the TSST, we expected that they would be more distressed than the first group who had already familiarized themselves with the laboratory setting. Given that novelty to testing environments can be appraised as stressful (Sindi et al., 2013), preliminary analyses assessed whether visit order modulated cardiovascular functioning. This manipulation does not represent a circadian dissimilarity since participants were all exposed to the TSST in the afternoon (arrival time: M = 14.34, SE = 0.11; departure time: M = 16.17, SE = 0.11).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A