Sensor principles and calibration

OP Ole Pedersen
TC Timothy D Colmer
EG Emilio Garcia-Robledo
NR Niels P Revsbech
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

In contrast to CO2, Clark-type O2 microsensors have long been available to plant scientists, enabling continuous measurements of tissue O2 with high temporal and spatial resolution (Clark, 1956; Armstrong, 1979; Revsbech, 1989). CO2 microsensors of the Severinghaus type (Severinghaus and Bradley, 1958) are available, but these are based upon indirect measurements of CO2 via changes in pH using a pH-sensitive transducer embedded in a small reservoir with bicarbonate and carbonic anhydrase (CA) to speed up hydration of CO2 (Caflisch et al., 1979; De Beer et al., 1997; Zhao and Cai, 1997). Due to the pH-sensitive transducer, these sensors are sluggish and respond to external CO2 in a logarithmic fashion with poor resolution at high CO2 concentrations.

In the present study, leaf tissue CO2 and O2 were measured using custom-built microsensors. The novel CO2 microsensor with a tip diameter of 35 μm consisted of an outer casing sealed at the very tip with a gas-permeable silicone membrane (Fig. 1A). Behind the membrane, there was a reservoir holding a chemical O2 scavenger (1 mol CrCl2 L–1 in 0.1 mol HCl L–1) to prevent O2 interference with CO2. The tip of the CO2 transducer was positioned within the outer casing about 80 μm behind the outer membrane. The microsensor was polarized at –1.2 V and had a linear response to CO2 in the external medium up to at least 1400 μmol L–1 (4 kPa), and was insensitive to O2 (Fig. 1B). When the microsensor was not used, the tip was stored in an alkaline ascorbate solution (zero O2 and CO2; see calibration of O2 microsensor) to keep the zero current low and to extend the life time of the chemical O2 scavenger.

Calibrations of the CO2 microsensor were carried out at 20 °C at three different CO2 concentrations in artificial lake water (always at 10 % concentration; for composition see ‘Plant material’) of low and high pO2 to check possible interference from O2. A calibration solution of zero CO2 and zero O2 was obtained by bubbling the artificial lake water without any inorganic carbon added and at pH >11 with high purity N2 for 1 h; at high pH, all inorganic carbon is converted into CO32– (although inorganic carbon was not added to the solution, it might still have dissolved from atmospheric air) and the N2 removes (purges out) dissolved O2 and also CO2. A solution with zero CO2 but with approx. 40 kPa pO2 was obtained by mixing solutions purged with high purity N2 or O2 and adjusted to pH >11. Calibration solutions with either zero O2 or approx. 40 kPa pO2 but with a CO2 concentration of about 700 or 1400 μmol L–1 (corresponding to approx. 2085 and 4071 Pa pCO2) were prepared by injecting known amounts of KHCO3 into acidified (pH <2 using HCl) artificial lake water prepared as above. The CO2 microsensor used in the present study did not show any interference with O2 within the range tested (0–40 kPa pO2, Fig. 1B). The CO2 microsensor was calibrated prior to each experiment, and calibration and O2 sensitivity were again checked after each experiment, at 24–30 h after the first calibration depending on the experimental design. If calibrations before and after measurements differed, corrections were performed by assuming linear drift in signal over time.

The O2 microsensor (tip diameter = 25 μm) used for tissue O2 measurements was constructed according to Revsbech (1989) and polarized at –0.8 V. It was calibrated at zero O2 (approx. 2 g of ascorbate in 100 mL of deionized H2O in 0.1 N NaOH) and at air equilibrium (284 mmol O2 m–3 at 20 °C, corresponding to 20.6 kPa pO2). The sensor has previously been shown to respond linearly to O2 up to 101 kPa pO2 (Revsbech, 1989).

The CO2 and the O2 microsensors were connected to a picoampere meter (Field Multimeter, Unisense A/S, Denmark) and the sensor signals were collected with a frequency of one sample per minute using data acquisition software (SensorTrace Suite 2.8, Unisense).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A