Sub-gap absorption in c–Si arises from two distinct mechanisms. The first is electronic bandgap narrowing (BGN), denoted by ΔEg (in eV). This allows c–Si to absorb sub-gap photons with energies less than Eg but above (Eg − ΔEg), where Eg is the bandgap energy (in eV) of unperturbed c–Si. In Sentaurus, ΔEg is estimated using Schenk’s model40 and leads to a slight drop in VOC. The second mechanism allows c–Si to absorb photons with energies less than (Eg − ΔEg) and originates from the exponentially decaying Urbach tail below the continuum band edge41,42. For non-crystalline solids, static disorder contributes to an exponential band tail of localized states below the electronic band edge. In c–Si, a similar tail of phonon-assisted optical absorption gives rise to mobile electron-hole pairs43,44. The sub-gap absorption is characterized by an exponential of the form: α(ν) ~ exp[{hν − EG(T)/E0(T)}], where ν is the optical frequency, EG(T) is the downshift of the continuum band edge corresponding to BGN and E0(T) is the Urbach slope.
In order to model the sub-gap absorption, we take the frequency dependent dielectric constant of Si over the 1000–1200 nm wavelength range from52 and fit it to a sum of Lorentz oscillator terms: . The fitting parameters ε∞, ωpj, Δεj and γj, given in Table 6, are obtained using an open MATLAB program53. We compare the absorption length λ/4πk (where k is the imaginary part of the refractive index) calculated form our fit and that obtained from52 in Fig. 13. The measured value of Urbach slope of c–Si at 300K is 8.5 ± 1.0 meV54. In comparison to this experimental data, microscopic modeling of the optical-absorption edge due to acoustic and optical phonons yields a slope of 8.6 meV43,44. The inset shows that the experimental data from52 exhibits an Urbach slope of 8.6 meV over the 1160–1190 nm wavelength range.
Fitting parameters for experimental Si dispersion data of52.
Fitting of absorption length of c–Si in 1000–1200 nm wavelength range with experimental data obtained from52. Fitting parameters are given in Table 6. Inset: Urbach slope exhibited by the experimental absorption coefficient.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.