Whole-body impedance cardiography

PK Pauliina Kangas
AT Antti Tikkakoski
JK Jarkko Kettunen
AE Arttu Eräranta
HH Heini Huhtala
MK Mika Kähönen
KS Kalle Sipilä
JM Jukka Mustonen
IP Ilkka Pörsti
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Whole-body impedance cardiography (CircMonR, JR Medical Ltd., Tallinn, Estonia), was used to determine beat-to-beat heart rate, cardiac output and aortic-to-popliteal pulse wave velocity (PWV)19,20. SVR and left cardiac work (LCW) were calculated from the tonometric BP and cardiac output measured by the CircMonR. Average supine central venous pressure is ~3–4 mmHg, while during upright position the value is close to zero mmHg2123. As central venous pressure was not measured in the present study, the formula for SVR estimation did not include this variable and was calculated as follows: SVR = 79.96 * mean arterial BP/cardiac output; 79.96 was the conversion factor from mmHg/L/min to dyn*s/cm5. LCW was calculated as 0.0143 × (mean arterial BP − pulmonary artery occlusion pressure) × cardiac output. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure was assumed to be 6 mmHg (normal), and 0.0143 was the conversion factor of pressure from millimeter of mercury to centimeters of water, volume to density of blood, centimeters to meters, and conversion from gram to gram force16. Time-domain estimate of aortic characteristic impedance [(pressure at inflection point - diastolic aortic BP) * systolic time)/(stroke volume * 2)] was calculated according to Chemla et al. so that aortic BP and systolic time were derived from pulse wave analysis and stroke volume from impedance cardiography24.

When using the CircMonR whole body impedance cardiography, the cardiac output values of correlate well with the thermodilution method (bias 0.00 l/min, 95% CI −0.26 to 0.26) and the direct oxygen Fick method (bias −0.32 l/min, 95% CI −0.69 to 0.05)25, corresponding upright reductions in cardiac output are observed when compared with thermodilution21, the upright stroke volume shows good correlation with 3-dimensional echocardiography (r = 0.781, bias 4.1 ml, 95% CI −2.2 to 10.4)16, and the PWV values show good correlation with the tonometric method (r = 0.82, bias 0.02 m/s, 95% CI −0.21 to 0.25)20. Due to technical problems, PWV from one subject, aortic characteristic impedance and AIx@75 from 3 subjects supine and 3 subjects upright, time to the return of the reflected wave from 3 subjects supine and 4 subjects upright, were missing.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A