Pathological analysis of α-synuclein by immunofluorescence staining

JM Joseph R. Mazzulli
FZ Friederike Zunke
TT Taiji Tsunemi
NT Nicholas J. Toker
SJ Sohee Jeon
LB Lena F. Burbulla
SP Samarjit Patnaik
ES Ellen Sidransky
JM Juan J. Marugan
CS Carolyn M. Sue
DK Dimitri Krainc
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Neurons were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, then blocked in 2% BSA, 5% normal goat serum in PBS-Triton for 30 min. LB509 (1:100) and anti-TH antibodies (1:100; Merck Millipore, 657012) were incubated overnight, washed in PBS-Triton, then AlexaFluor 568-conjugated anti-mouse IgG was used to detect α-syn,whereas AlexaFluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit was used to detect TH. Next, thioflavin S (Thio S) staining was performed as previously described (Mazzulli et al., 2006). The number of cells with α-syn and Thio S in the cell body [as either a diffuse (type I) or punctated (type II) pattern, as characterized in our previous study; Mazzulli et al., 2016] were scored and normalized to total cells in the field-of-view (calculated by nuclear DAPI stain). Only the Thio S+ cells that colocalized with α-syn were counted. Neuritic pathology was calculated by counting the number of α-syn+ neurites that colocalized with Thio S, and divided by the total number of neurites in the field-of-view. At least three fields of view were used per coverslip, and 100–500 cells counted per condition, per cell line. Images were obtained on a Leica epifluorescence microscope using a 40× objective (DMI3000B). To determine synaptic localization of α-syn, neurons were fixed as described but permeabilized in 0.1% Triton-containing blocking buffer. Anti-synapsin antibodies (ThermoFisher, A6442; 1:50 dilution) with LB509 (1:100 dilution) were detected with AlexaFluor-conjugated secondary antibodies and analyze by confocal microscopy as described previously (Mazzulli et al., 2016). Synapsin/α-syn colocalized puncta were quantified from merged images and expressed as fold-change compared with control conditions. The quantification represents the mean (±SEM) from five different fields-of-view from different culture wells with 100–200 puncta counted per field.

H4 cells were seeded on cover glass at a cell number of 4 × 104/24 wells. Cells were treated with DOX (2 μg/ml) for 5 d to turn off α-syn expression. For 758 analysis, H4 cells were cultured without DOX and treated with compound 758 (5 μm) or DMSO for 5 d. Cells were fixed in 4% PBS-buffered paraformaldehyde for 20 min and washed three times in PBS. Cells were permeabilized with 0.2% saponin (w/v)/PBS for 5 min, then with 0.2% (w/v) glycine/0.2% saponin in PBS, and blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin, 5% normal goat serum (Jackson Immunofluorescence) in 0.2% saponin/PBS for 30 min. Primary antibodies [anti-GCase, gift from Johannes Aerts, University of Leiden, NL; anti-LAMP2, Invitrogen, 51-2210; anti-protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) Abcam, ab11432] were diluted 1:100 in blocking buffer, incubated overnight at 4°C, then washed and incubated with secondary antibodies (AlexaFluor 568-conjugated anti-mouse, and AlexaFluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit, 1:400 dilution). Cells were mounted on microscope slides using DAPI-Fluoromount G (Southern Biotech) and imaged using a Leica confocal microscope as described previously (Mazzulli et al., 2016). Images were analyzed by ImageJ software using the colocalization plugin Coloc 2. Pearson correlation values of GCase + LAMP2, or GCase + PDI were obtained from six fields-of-view from different culture wells for each condition, and data were expressed as fold-change compared with the control condition. The quantifications represent the mean ± SEM.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A