Analysis of mitochondrial morphology by transmission electron microscopy

KF Karen A Fortner
LB Luz P Blanco
IB Iwona Buskiewicz
NH Nick Huang
PG Pamela C Gibson
DC Deborah L Cook
HP Hege L Pedersen
PY Peter S T Yuen
MM Michael P Murphy
AP Andras Perl
MK Mariana J Kaplan
RB Ralph C Budd
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Cells were fixed for 1 hour at 65°C in 2% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Polysciences, Warrington, Pennsylvania, USA) in 100 mM sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2). Samples were washed in cacodylate buffer and then postfixed for 1 hour in 1% osmium tetroxide (Polysciences). Samples were then extensively rinsed in distilled H2O before undergoing en bloc staining for 1 hour with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate (Ted Pella). After several rinses in distilled H2O, the samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol and then embedded in Eponate 12 resin (Ted Pella). Sections (95 nm in thickness) were cut with an Ultracut UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and viewed on a JEOL 1400 transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA) equipped with an XR611 high-resolution, 11-megapixel mid-mount charge-coupled device camera (Advanced Microscopy Techniques, Woburn, Massachusetts, USA).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A