2.2. Fungi identification

EM Ester Alves Mota
ÉF Érica Barbosa Felestrino
VL Versiane Albis Leão
RG Renata Guerra-Sá
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Genomic DNA was extracted from two sample of fungal mycelium (200 mg) by the CTAB (Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide) method [19]. The integrity of DNA was observed on a 0.6 % (wt/vol) agarose gel. The DNA concentration was measured (Nano Vue, GE). Amplification of the ITS ribosomal region was performed following the protocol [20]. The primers used for PCR were ITS4 (reverse) and ITS5 (forward) described in [21]. In this experiment, a negative control was created using water instead of genomic DNA. PCR products were run on a 1.2 % agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide for visualization on a UV transilluminator (Vilber Lourmat). The negative control was visualized without amplicons. Three samples were sequenced using an automated Sanger sequencer (AB1 3100, Applied Biosystems) and a Big Dye cycle sequence kit (Applied Biosystems). A consensus sequence was subjected to nBLAST to retrieve type material sequences. The related sequences were aligned with the consensus sequence in CLUSTAL Omega; Phylip format and the sequences’ global alignment were cut in Phylogeny FR, Gblocks. The Phylip archive was used to construct a distance tree using the Kimura algorithm (2000 replicates). The phylogenetic tree was visualized in FigTree 1.4.2.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A