Sampling and analysis of hydrothermal vent fluids

CT Chunhui Tao
WJ W. E. Seyfried, Jr
RL R. P. Lowell
YL Yunlong Liu
JL Jin Liang
ZG Zhikui Guo
KD Kang Ding
HZ Huatian Zhang
JL Jia Liu
LQ Lei Qiu
IE Igor Egorov
SL Shili Liao
MZ Minghui Zhao
JZ Jianping Zhou
XD Xianming Deng
HL Huaiming Li
HW Hanchuang Wang
WC Wei Cai
GZ Guoyin Zhang
HZ Hongwei Zhou
JL Jian Lin
WL Wei Li
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Hydrothermal fluid samples from the sulfide structures at Longqi-1 vent area were collected using pressurized, piston-driven sampling devices, constructed entirely of titanium. These devices make use of compressed nitrogen to maintain each sample at seafloor pressure before and during sampling, and are similar in design and concept to IGT samplers developed in ref. 53. Immediately after arrival of the samplers on board, aliquots were taken for pH, and measurement of the dissolved gases (H2, H2S, CH4) were undertaken. For a detailed description of on-board analytical methods see refs. 28,53. Additional sub-samples were preserved for shore-based analysis of major dissolved anions/cations and trace metals. The trace metal aliquot was immediately acidified with analytical grade HCl (Optima). A fraction of this sub-sample was then diluted 50-fold and utilized for analysis of aqueous silica. Both fractions were stored in pre-weighed and acid cleaned high-density polyethylene bottles. Precipitates that formed in the titanium samplers were collected on a 0.45-μm nylon filter and subsequently re-dissolved in HCl/HNO3 (Ultrex). Based on the total volume of the particular sampler used, the amount of metals measured in the precipitate was recombined with metals that remained in solution to obtain a complete metal inventory for the vent fluid samples. Essentially, this process only affected Fe, Cu, and Zn. For vent fluid samples above 300 °C, the precipitates account for 90% of the reported concentrations of Cu and Zn, but less than 10% of the Fe28. The shore-based analysis of all major dissolved cations/anions was conducted using ICP-OES and/or ion chromatography, while trace metals were determined by ICP-MS. The analytical uncertainties (2σ) is ±2% for Cl (Ion chromatography), ±10% for H2, CH4 (gas chromatography–TCD) and H2S (CuCl2-precipitation/H2O2 reduction). Other elements are measured with ICP-MS, and 2σ uncertainties are ±2% for major species and ±5% for minor species27. Detection limits by ICP-MS are approximately an order of magnitude below reported concentrations. The hydrogen and oxygen isotopes of hydrothermal vent fluids were measured at the University of Arizona using a Thermo Finnigan Delta XP isotope ratio mass spectrometer. All samples were measured at least in duplicate and results are principally given in the standard delta notation in per mil (‰) vs. VSMOW according to δ18O (D) [‰] = (Rsample/Rreference−Rreference) × 1000 fluid samples54. The endmember composition of hydrothermal fluids was calculated using a least-squares regression of the individual components versus Mg with extrapolation to Mg zero and including the respective seawater values. Vent fluid chemistry is summarized in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A