DNA extraction

MB Maxime Borry
BC Bryan Cordova
AP Angela Perri
MW Marsha Wibowo
TH Tanvi Prasad Honap
JK Jada Ko
JY Jie Yu
KB Kate Britton
LG Linus Girdland-Flink
RP Robert C. Power
IS Ingelise Stuijts
DS Domingo C. Salazar-García
CH Courtney Hofman
RH Richard Hagan
TK Thérèse Samdapawindé Kagoné
NM Nicolas Meda
HC Helene Carabin
DJ David Jacobson
KR Karl Reinhard
CL Cecil Lewis
AK Aleksandar Kostic
CJ Choongwon Jeong
AH Alexander Herbig
AH Alexander Hübner
CW Christina Warinner
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

For paleofeces and sediment samples, DNA extractions were performed using a silica spin column protocol (Dabney et al., 2013) with minor modifications in dedicated aDNA cleanrooms located at LMAMR (Mexican paleofeces) and the MPI-SHH (all other paleofeces). At LMAMR, the modifications followed those of method D described in Hagan et al. (2020). DNA extractions at the MPI-SHH were similar, but omitted the initial bead-beating step, and a single silica column was used per sample instead of two. Additionally, to reduce centrifugation errors, DNA extractions performed at the MPI-SHH substituted the column apparatus from the High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Large Volume Kit (Roche, Switzerland) in place of the custom assembled Zymo-reservoirs coupled to MinElute (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) columns described in Dabney et al. (2013). Samples processed at the MPI-SHH were also partially treated with uracil-DNA-glycosylase (UDG) enzyme to confine DNA damage to the ends of the DNA molecules (Rohland et al., 2015).

For modern feces, DNA was extracted from Burkina Faso fecal samples using the AllPrep PowerViral DNA/RNA Qiagen kit at Centre MURAZ Research Institute in Burkina Faso. DNA was extracted from the Boston fecal material using the ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit (D4303) at the Joslin Diabetes Center.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A