Targeted sequencing

AR Ana Rio-Machin
TV Tom Vulliamy
NH Nele Hug
AW Amanda Walne
KT Kiran Tawana
SC Shirleny Cardoso
AE Alicia Ellison
NP Nikolas Pontikos
JW Jun Wang
HT Hemanth Tummala
AS Ahad Fahad H. Al Seraihi
JA Jenna Alnajar
FB Findlay Bewicke-Copley
HA Hannah Armes
MB Michael Barnett
AB Adrian Bloor
CB Csaba Bödör
DB David Bowen
PF Pierre Fenaux
AG Andrew Green
AH Andrew Hallahan
HH Henrik Hjorth-Hansen
UH Upal Hossain
SK Sally Killick
SL Sarah Lawson
ML Mark Layton
AM Alison M. Male
JM Judith Marsh
PM Priyanka Mehta
RM Rogier Mous
JN Josep F. Nomdedéu
CO Carolyn Owen
JP Jiri Pavlu
EP Elspeth M. Payne
RP Rachel E. Protheroe
CP Claude Preudhomme
NP Nuria Pujol-Moix
AR Aline Renneville
NR Nigel Russell
AS Anand Saggar
GS Gabriela Sciuccati
DT David Taussig
CT Cynthia L. Toze
AU Anne Uyttebroeck
PV Peter Vandenberghe
BS Brigitte Schlegelberger
TR Tim Ripperger
DS Doris Steinemann
JW John Wu
JM Joanne Mason
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Targeted sequencing of 10 known disease genes (ACD, ANKRD26, CEBPA, DDX41, ETV6, GATA2, RUNX1, SRP72, TERC, and TERT) was performed for the index case of each family using the accredited testing facility at the West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratories (WMRGL) in Birmingham, UK [https://www.geneadviser.com/genetictest/familial_mds_familial_aml_sequencing_birmingham]. Variants were considered pathogenic if they had been previously described to be associated with familial MDS/AML or new variants (SNVs or indels) meeting the following criteria: (1) minor allele frequency in healthy population (ExAC and gnomAD databases) <0.00001, (2) variant allele frequency >30%, (3) predicted to be pathogenic with two out of four tools for functional annotation (PolyPhen2, MutationTaster, SIFT and Provean), (4) sufficient evidence of pathogenicity and not meeting any criteria for a benign assertion following ACMG guidelines74, and (5) where practical, the segregation with affected individuals.

A targeted myeloid panel of 33 genes frequently mutated in MDS/AML (ASXL1 (exon 12), BCOR (all), CALR (exon 9), CBL (exons 7 + 8 + 9), CEBPA (all), CSF3R (exons 14–17), DNMT3A (all), ETV6 (all), EZH2 (all), FLT3 (exons 14 + 15 + 20), GATA2 (all), GNAS (exons 8 + 9), IDH1 (exon 4), IDH2 (exon 4), IKZF1 (all), JAK2 (exons 12 + 14), KIT (exons 2, 8–11, 13 + 17), KRAS (exons 2 + 3), MPL (exon 10), NPM1 (exon 12), NRAS (exons 2 + 3), PDGFRA (exons 12, 14, 18), PHF6 (all), PTPN11 (exons 3 + 13), RUNX1 (all), SETBP1 (exon 4), SF3B1 (exons 12 – 16), SRSF2 (exon 1), TET2 (all), TP53 (all), U2AF1 (exons 2 + 6), WT1 (exons 7 + 9) and ZRSR2 (all)) was employed to determine the acquired variants in the five patients with germline DHX34 variants. An in-house True SeqCustom Amplicon (TSCA) design (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) was used for target enrichment. Pooled library targets were sequenced the MiSeq sequencing platform. Minimum read depth threshold was 150 reads and lower limit of sensitivity was 5–10% variant allele frequency (VAF).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A