Workshop structure

KS Kevin P. Shah
SG Shreya Goyal
VR Vignesh Ramachandran
JK Jaden R. Kohn
JG Jonathan A. Go
ZW Zachary Wiley
AM Anoosha Moturu
MN Meera K. Namireddy
AK Anjali Kumar
RJ Ryan C. Jacobs
MS Matthew Stampfl
JS Jesal R. Shah
JF Justin Fu
WL Weijie V. Lin
BH Brandon Ho
GW Grace Wey
SL Sophie Y. Lin
AC Andrew C. Caruso
LG Lindsey Jordan Gay
DS Diana E. Stewart
SA Sara Andrabi
ask Ask a question
Favorite

All workshops were designed to include both a didactic component and a hands-on interactive component. A methodology of teaching, in which students focus on active learning during each session rather than didactic learning, was utilized [20, 21]. This ‘modified’ flipped classroom methodology leveraged the core principle of focus on application of content rather than attainment. However, it was considered to be modified primarily because students did not receive resources or materials to review prior to attending the workshops. Each workshop had a variation of the following basic structure:

Completion of pre-workshop survey

Brief didactic session to teach general principles of QI/PS in addition to information pertinent to learning a specific QI/PS skill

Hands-on interactive exercises

Group reflection upon the learned QI/PS skill

Completion of post-workshop survey

Most workshops were one hour in length with the exception of the RCA and process mapping workshops which required 1.5–2 h each.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A