Mouse pharmacokinetic analysis.

AP Andrés Palencia
XL Xianfeng Li
WB Wei Bu
WC Wai Choi
CD Charles Z. Ding
EE Eric E. Easom
LF Lisa Feng
VH Vincent Hernandez
PH Paul Houston
LL Liang Liu
MM Maliwan Meewan
MM Manisha Mohan
FR Fernando L. Rock
HS Holly Sexton
SZ Suoming Zhang
YZ Yasheen Zhou
BW Baojie Wan
YW Yuehong Wang
SF Scott G. Franzblau
LW Lisa Woolhiser
VG Veronica Gruppo
AL Anne J. Lenaerts
TO Theresa O'Malley
TP Tanya Parish
CC Christopher B. Cooper
MW M. Gerard Waters
ZM Zhenkun Ma
TI Thomas R. Ioerger
JS James C. Sacchettini
JR Joaquín Rullas
IA Iñigo Angulo-Barturen
EP Esther Pérez-Herrán
AM Alfonso Mendoza
DB David Barros
SC Stephen Cusack
JP Jacob J. Plattner
MA M. R. K. Alley
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Mouse pharmacokinetic studies were conducted by using female CD-1 mice for compounds 1, 11, and 12, while BALB/c mice were used for compound 13. Mouse body weights were 19 to 28 g, and on the morning of dosing, mice were split randomly into 3 dosing groups to receive the test article by either intravenous (i.v.) tail vein injection or oral (p.o.) gavage. After dosing, blood samples were collected via cardiac puncture at specific time points (n = 3 mice/time point) through 24 h (K2EDTA as an anticoagulant) and processed for plasma. Antibiotic concentrations in the plasma samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The LC-MS/MS analysis was conducted by using analyte/internal standard peak area methods. The internal standard was AN3365 (21), and the instrument used was an API4000 QTRAP instrument (AB Sciex). The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 1 or 2 ng/ml. Pharmacokinetic analyses of the mean plasma concentration-time profiles were performed by using WinNonlin Pro version 5.2. A compartmental model was used for the data for i.v. dosing, and a noncompartmental model was used for the data for p.o. dosing. The concentration-time curve after an i.v. dose showed a biexponential decline with first-order elimination. Compounds 1 and 13 were formulated in saline (0.9% [wt/vol] NaCl) at 7.5 mg/ml, and the pH was adjusted to >5 by the addition of NaOH. Compound 11 was formulated to 6.5 mg/ml in water-dimethylacetamide-ethanol (EtOH) (76:19:5), and the pH was adjusted to >5 by the addition of NaOH. Compound 12 was formulated to 7.5 mg/ml in PEG 300-propylene glycol (PG)-water (55:25:20), and the pH was adjusted to >5 by the addition of NaOH.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A