Both carnosine and anserine in the samples were extracted by water. Briefly, a 1.0 g portion of the sample was mixed with 9.0 mL of ultrapure water by a vortex mixer (XW-80A, Shanghai, China). The mixture was heated at 50 °C for 10 min in an electro-thermostatic water bath (HH-1, Jiangsu, China), and then was centrifuged at 10000 g and 4 °C for 10 min. Each sample was extracted twice by the above procedures. The supernatants were collected and diluted with water to 25 mL. The obtained solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) prior to analysis.
The contents of carnosine and anserine in samples were determined by the HPLC method. The HPLC system consisted of a Waters e2695 series (Medford, MA, USA) equipped with a degasser, quaternary pump, column oven, ultraviolet detector, and automatic sampler. A reversed-phase chromatographic column (Capcell PAK C18 AQ S5, 250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm) was purchased from Osaka Soda Co. (Osaka, Japan). The mobile phase, consisting of 99% phosphate buffer solution (20 mmol/L, pH 9.0) and 1% methanol, was filtrated through a 0.22 μm filter and degassed ultrasonically prior to use. The chromatographic column was equilibrated at 35 °C. The flow rate was set at 1.0 mL/min. The injection volume was 5 μL. Carnosine and anserine were detected by the ultraviolet detector at 230 nm. Calibration curves were constructed of peak areas versus standard carnosine and anserine concentrations (1.0–500 mg/L). The limit of detection (LOD), the limit of quantification (LOQ), and the recovery and the relative repeatability standard deviation (RSDr) were calculated according to Snyder et al. [38]. LOD and LOQ were estimated as follows: LOD = 3.3 σ/S’ and LOQ = 10 σ/S’, where σ and S‘ are the standard deviation and slope of the calibration curve, respectively.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.