In order to validate the operation of the e-reader, we emulated different FCs and sensors reported in the literature(Figure 4). We emulated FCs and sensors based on urine/Cr(VI) [41] and methanol [51,52] by using a source measurement unit (SMU). Moreover, we carried out experimental tests with an emulated ethanol FC as a sensor [40] and a commercial ethanol FC as a power source.
Summary diagram of the validation tests performed.
These approaches fully validated the e-reader implementation. For each case, key design parameters are indicated, like the open-circuit voltage (OCV), and the related concentrations of the involved sample.
The urine/Cr(VI)’s FC presented by [41] is able to generate electrical power from processing human urine and heavy metal, in this case, Cr(VI). This FC reduces Cr(VI) in human urine, using urine as fuel and Cr(VI) as oxidant. The open-circuit voltage (OCV) ranges from 1.11 V at 13 mg·L−1 to 1.26 V at 50 mg·L−1. In addition, this FC provides a maximum power density going from 3.4 W·m−2 at 50 mg·L−1 of Cr(VI) to 2.2 W·m−2 at 13 mg·L−1 of Cr(VI). To validate the operation of the proposed system, we used the same urine/Cr (VI) FC as a sensor and as a power source.
In this case, we used a methanol FC as a power source and as a sensor to detect methanol. We emulated and employed a passive direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) as a power source for portable electronic devices [51]. In the study, the authors used six dual DMFC connected in series to produce energy. In order to validate the e-reader operation, we considered a single FC of 1 cm2 with a 1 M of methanol concentration. It was only necessary to use a single FC because the developed e-reader was a low power device and operated with a minimum voltage of 330 mV. A single DMFC with a 1 M of methanol concentration provides a maximum power density of 5 mW·cm−2, a maximum current density of 22 mA·cm−2 and an OCV of 0.6 V.
The emulated sensor is reported in [52]. It is a wearable vapor/liquid amphibious electrochemical sensor for monitoring methanol. The sensor exhibits high selectivity, good repeatability, and reliable stability for both vapor and liquid methanol. It was tested with methanol concentrations that go from 0% to 6%, providing current densities that go from 90 to 3.5 µA·mm−2. We validated the e-reader considering a methanol sensor of 1 mm2.
After emulating different approaches based on fuel cells and sensors, we carried on experimental verification working with a commercial FC. To perform the experimental test with the e-reader, we used as a power source the commercial FCJJ-42 ethanol fuel cell science kit (Horizon Fuel Cell Technologies; Singapore). Due to the fact that the characteristics of this FC are not described, we characterized it, obtaining the I–V curves for different ethanol concentrations that go from 3% to 9%. This ethanol FC provides a maximum power going from 0.23 W at 9% to 0.186 W at 3%. The maximum current given is 700 mA at 9% and 540 mA at 3%. All concentrations tested presented an OCV close to 1 V. To validate the system, we used the commercial ethanol FC with 3% of concentration as a power source.
The chosen FC used to sense ethanol was presented in [40]. It is a single-cell membraneless microfluidic FC that operates in the presence of simulated body fluids, human serum, and blood enriched with ethanol as the fuel. It provides current densities up to 6.5 mA·cm−2.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.