Study design, population and period

GQ Gianluca Quaglio
FT Francesca Tognon
LF Livio Finos
DB David Bome
SS Santigie Sesay
AK Atiba Kebbie
FG Francesco Di Gennaro
BC Bienvenu Salim Camara
CM Claudia Marotta
VP Vincenzo Pisani
ZB Zainab Bangura
DP Damiano Pizzol
AS Annalisa Saracino
WM Walter Mazzucco
SJ Susan Jones
GP Giovanni Putoto
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

A prospective observational study using routinely collected health services data, from January 2012 to December 2017, was carried out. Three time periods were considered: pre-Ebola period (1 January 2012 to 30 May 2014); Ebola period (1 June 2014 to 28 February 2015); post-Ebola period (1 March 2015 to 31 December 2017). We considered the Ebola period from 1 month before the first confirmed case in the district (ie, June 2014) to 1 month after the country being declared Ebola-free (ie, February 2015). This was done because in Sierra Leone the outbreak had started in other districts of the country before the first case registered in Pujehun and continued to affect other districts until November 2015. It is realistic to assume that public fear of potential EVD cases and lack of confidence in the health services persisted in the Pujehun population during that time.14 In addition, expanding the Ebola period enabled a full assessment of the impact of the disease with an adequate comparison with the two long periods before and after the Ebola epidemic.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A