We summarized baseline respondent characteristics by race/ethnicity and gender. We used chi-square statistics to compare categorical variables and analysis of variance to compare continuous variables, as shown in Table 1. We fit random-effects multinomial regression models using the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS software (version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to compare the facility-specific proportions of participants who were “less than” or “somewhat” versus “very” satisfied (reference level) for each domain, specifying a random effect to account for clustering of Veterans within VAMCs.
Because preliminary analyses indicated a significant interaction between race/ethnicity and gender, we modeled gender-specific associations between race/ethnicity and satisfaction for each domain. Each model included fixed effects for gender, age (centered to the overall mean age [55] and scaled by 10 years), race/ethnicity, and the gender-by-race/ethnicity interaction, and a random effect for site. We adjusted for age in all models to account for differences in the age distributions by race/ethnicity. We assessed gender-specific differences between race/ethnicity subgroups using two-parameter 0.05-level Wald tests that simultaneously compared “less than satisfied” and “somewhat satisfied” to “very satisfied”; we also report pairwise Wald tests comparing these response categories. We constructed gender-specific linear contrasts of satisfaction for black versus white and Hispanic versus white Veterans, and race/ethnicity-specific contrasts from the same statistical model to assess gender differences within each race/ethnicity category for all domains except women’s health. P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, with no adjustment made for multiple comparisons.
In a sensitivity analysis, we assessed potential confounding in the age-adjusted models by considering each of the covariates shown in Table 1. We included variables significant at the 0.10 level in the domain of outpatient care in all domain-specific multivariable models. For each domain-specific model, we then used a backwards selection approach (removing variables with p > 0.10) to identify a parsimonious set of covariates. We assessed whether conclusions from the age-adjusted models changed based on this statistical adjustment for potential confounders.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.